Shield) in lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required hinein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met hinein forward facing CRSs with restraining https://www.openlearning.com/u/curtishemmingsen-ss5t8n/blog/TheGreatestGuideToSafetyBeltWebbing